PharmD Signal

Deep dives, evidence grades, and clinical tools, all in one place.

LAIAs help intellectual disability patients with SMI, not off-label behavior

long-acting injectable antipsychoticsoral antipsychoticsintellectual disabilityschizophreniabipolar disorderdepot antipsychoticsself-controlled case seriesextrapyramidal symptomsoff-label prescribinghealthcare utilisationpharmacoepidemiology Geriatrics / Geriatric Pharmacy

Background Information

LAIAs show promise for PWID with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, but caution is needed for others.

The study explores the impact of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) versus oral antipsychotics (OAs) on healthcare utilisation in people with intellectual disability (PWID), a population with limited existing guidance. LAIA use was linked to reduced incidence of emergency department visits and psychiatric hospitalisations in PWID with schizophrenia/bipolar disorder, but increased cardiovascular hospitalisations compared to OAs. The data supports considering LAIAs for PWID with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, while advising caution with off-label use in those without these diagnoses due to potential increased risks. LAIAs may benefit PWID with schizophrenia/bipolar disorder, but off-label use in other PWID requires careful evaluation.

📊 Deep Analysis Available
Subscribers get the full breakdown: study design, outcomes, pharmacist implications, clinical pearls, GRADE evidence grade, and a downloadable PDF report. Cancel anytime.
Subscribe for $8/month → Read this one free →
Free account, no credit card. Includes 1 full deep analysis every month.

Authors: Leung SM, Lee KJ, Wei Y, Yan VKC, Deng EK, Deb S, Castle D, Huang C, Yiu HHE, Lui SS, Ng VWS, Lai FTT, Yan WC, Chan EW

Citation: Leung SM, Lee KJ, Wei Y, et al. Differences in associations between long-acting injectable and oral antipsychotic prescribing and healthcare utilisation in people with intellectual disability: a self-controlled case series (LOID study). BMJ mental health. 2026;29(1). doi:10.1136/bmjment-2026-302830

Article Links: PubMed · Journal / DOI · Free Full Text (PMC)

🎓
Reviewed by a licensed pharmacist
Every analysis is reviewed and approved by a licensed pharmacist before publication, ensuring clinical accuracy and relevance.
Accurate and up-to-date information is our highest priority.
If you spot an error, please suggest a correction. If there is a topic you want covered, tell us and we will look at it.
Thanks for the feedback!
🔒
Deep Analysis: Subscribers Only
Subscribers receive access to a complete clinical analysis, available online and as a downloadable PDF.
Executive Summary
Study Design
Patient Population
Primary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes & Safety Profile
Pharmacist Implications
Clinical Pearls
Limitations
Controversies & Evidence Gaps
Cost & Logistics
Founding member rate
$8/month. Cancel anytime.

One subscription unlocks this analysis and every other one we publish, plus Practice Signals, PDF reports, and GRADE evidence grades.

Subscribe for $8/month → Read this one free →
Free account, no credit card. Includes 1 full deep analysis every month.
Or $79/year. Founding members keep this rate for as long as they stay subscribed. Cancel anytime from your Account page.