How Clinicians Want Deprescribing Written Into Practice Guidelines
This qualitative study identifies the specific content, language, and format features clinicians say make deprescribing recommendations actually usable, directly relevant to how Beers Criteria and other older-adult guidance should be structured.
Enhancing deprescribing guidelines could improve care for older adults.
Deprescribing in older adults requires careful consideration, yet is often underrepresented in clinical guidelines. Improving this can enhance guideline effectiveness. Three themes emerged: need for higher content quality, clarity versus comprehensiveness balance, and optimal placement of recommendations. The study highlights the complexity of deprescribing compared to prescribing, urging more detailed and actionable recommendations in guidelines. Enhancing deprescribing recommendations can improve guideline implementation in older adults.
📊 Deep Analysis Available
Subscribers get the full breakdown: study design, outcomes, pharmacist implications, clinical pearls, GRADE evidence grade, and a downloadable PDF report.
Citation:Langford AV, Liau SJ, Loh S, et al. Designing Implementable Deprescribing Recommendations: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Professional Perspectives. Journal of general internal medicine. 2026. doi:10.1007/s11606-026-10679-x
Subscribers receive access to a complete clinical analysis, available online and as a downloadable PDF.
Executive Summary
Study Design
Patient Population
Primary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes & Safety Profile
Pharmacist Implications
Clinical Pearls
Limitations
Controversies & Evidence Gaps
Cost & Logistics
Want the full analysis?
Subscribe to PharmD Signal for unrestricted access to every deep analysis, plus PDF reports, GRADE evidence grades, and pharmacist implications for every article we publish.