PharmD Signal

Deep dives, evidence grades, and clinical tools, all in one place.

LAAC Noninferior to DOACs in High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation

left atrial appendage closureLAACdirect oral anticoagulantsDOACapixabanatrial fibrillationstroke preventionbleedingPRAGUE-17noninferiority trialanticoagulation Anticoagulation / Hematology
Also in Cardiology

Background Information

LAAC proves noninferior to DOACs in high-risk AF stroke prevention.

Determining effective and safer alternatives for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of bleeding is crucial. The study found that left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is noninferior to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in preventing major adverse events in high-risk AF patients. LAAC may be considered as an alternative to DOACs for patients who are at high risk of stroke and bleeding, given its comparable efficacy and safety profile. LAAC offers a valid option to DOACs for high-risk AF patients with similar efficacy.

📊 Deep Analysis Available
Subscribers get the full breakdown: study design, outcomes, pharmacist implications, clinical pearls, GRADE evidence grade, and a downloadable PDF report. Cancel anytime.
Subscribe for $8/month → Read this one free →
Free account, no credit card. Includes 1 full deep analysis every month.

Authors: Osmancik P, Herman D, Neuzil P, Hala P, Taborsky M, Kala P, Poloczek M, Stasek J, Haman L, Branny M, Chovancik J, Cervinka P, Holy J, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, Havranek S, Vancura V, Opatrny J, Peichl P, Tousek P, Lekesova V, Jarkovsky J, Novackova M, Benesova K, Widimsky P, Reddy VY, PRAGUE-17 Trial Investigators

Citation: Osmancik P, Herman D, Neuzil P, et al. Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020;75(25):3122-3135. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067

Article Links: PubMed · Journal / DOI

🎓
Reviewed by a licensed pharmacist
Every analysis is reviewed and approved by a licensed pharmacist before publication, ensuring clinical accuracy and relevance.
Accurate and up-to-date information is our highest priority.
If you spot an error, please suggest a correction. If there is a topic you want covered, tell us and we will look at it.
Thanks for the feedback!
🔒
Deep Analysis: Subscribers Only
Subscribers receive access to a complete clinical analysis, available online and as a downloadable PDF.
Executive Summary
Study Design
Patient Population
Primary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes & Safety Profile
Pharmacist Implications
Clinical Pearls
Limitations
Controversies & Evidence Gaps
Cost & Logistics
Founding member rate
$8/month. Cancel anytime.

One subscription unlocks this analysis and every other one we publish, plus Practice Signals, PDF reports, and GRADE evidence grades.

Subscribe for $8/month → Read this one free →
Free account, no credit card. Includes 1 full deep analysis every month.
Or $79/year. Founding members keep this rate for as long as they stay subscribed. Cancel anytime from your Account page.